Norwich North by-election result weakens Gordon Brown further

On Friday the Conservatives secured a 7,348 seat majority in Norwich North, making Chloe Smith the youngest MP at 27.

This used to be a safe seat for Labour but the way in which Dr. Ian Gibson was dropped by his party, meant that in reality Labour never had any chance of retaining this seat.

Like many MPs Dr. Gibson was caught up in the expenses scandal, for claiming for a flat in which his daughter lived rent-free before selling it to her for half its market value.

Regret

There is little doubt that Dr. Gibson would have regretted this, but his constituents still valued him greatly as an MP and did not want to lose him.

The decision then from Gordon Brown to tell Dr. Gibson he would not be allowed to stand as an MP at the next election, was not welcomed by the people of Norwich North.

One could argue that what Gibson did was not any worse than what other MPs did who kept their jobs. So why was he singled out? If the Labour leadership was connected to its grass roots then this decision would never have been made.

Brown attacked

The Labour MP Barry Sheerman, has today decided to launch an attack on Gordon Brown saying he had until "this summer to show he's got the capability to do it." Shearman was at the forefront of previous calls for Brown to go so this is no real surprise, but calls for the PM's head will not go away.

Gordon Brown has failed as a leader and any Labour supporter must surely be despairing at the mess their party is in. Put simply there is no chance that Gordon Brown can lead the Labour party into a general election win in 2010.

So why are Labour persevering with Gordon Brown? It could be that no-one else in the party wants to be put their neck out in what is a difficult time for the country.

Defeatist

If they wait until after the likely election defeat, then the successor will be able to start again with a fesh slate, something they could not do now. But this is surely a depressing way of going about politics, when personal ambition becomes more important than sorting the country out.

By sleep-walking into an election defeat Labour are leaving the country in a vulnerable state. A lame-duck government is no good for anyone, especially when the economy is in such a dire state.

What is needed now is a general election, and the sooner the better. Britain needs a fresh start under a fresh government.

Like many long serving governments, New Labour has now run its course and change is needed urgently.

Football paying the price

Carlos Tevez' move to Manchester City for £25 million is the latest in a long line of big money moves in football.

Back in 1994 Chris Sutton's £5 million move from Norwich to Blackburn broke records, but fifteen years on and Christiano Ronaldo has been sold for £80 million.

Sir Bobby Charlton called this figure 'vulgar' and it seems crazy that such an enormous amount of money should be spent on a footballer; particularly in a time of global recession.

Setting a precedent

Transfers on this scale are not of course the norm, but the reason why they matter is because of the precedent they set. Premiership teams pay astronomical wages to their star players and this puts pressure on the teams below them.

There have been exceptions such as Stoke City who have managed to stay in the top league without breaking the bank, but their stay may yet prove to be short-lived.

One just has to glance at the teams that were relegated from the Championship last season to see how times have changed. Norwich, Southampton and Charlton are all Premiership teams from the last four years, but ones who overstretched themsleves financially and paid the price.

The problem is that the more the top teams pay, the more the teams below them have to pay in order to keep up. Leeds United is an obvious example, where they went from Champions League football to League One in six years.

Reliance on one owner

The question must be asked; just how long can all of this go on? There have already been rumours of Premiership clubs struggling with finances and it is not particularly healthy for a team to rely on one single owner, as many Premiership clubs now do.

Chelsea have been running at a loss for several seasons and if Roman Abramovich decided to withdraw his investment, their business model would look decidedly shaky.

Manchester City are now the richest club in the world thanks to their owner Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyans, but again they are totally reliant on his investment.

Fans important

The fans at Manchester City will be happy about their new signings but should football clubs really be allowed to turn into play-things for their wealthy owners? The owners should remember that a club is nothing without its fans and right now the Premiership is in danger of losing its soul.

Much like the banking crisis that no-one appeared to see coming, football may too have to face a financial crash. Anyone who loves football will not want to see this happen, but unless financial caps are put in place for transfers and wages, this is a very real possiblity.

The governing bodies need to be aware of this and act fast, otherwise the hearts of many communities who love football are in danger of being ripped out by greed.

Phone hacking scandal taps into the political world

It emerged this week that The News of the World had allegedly been tapping celebrities, politicians and public officials' phones.

The reaction of the UK media (generally) was one of shock, with John Prescott appearing on almost every TV channel and radio station, clearly outgraged that someone may have read his texts. It baffles me that Prescott always has to shout when he is speaking into a microphone.

Of course it is not a good thought that newspapers have been conducting surveillance on people but to many within the industry, this news will not have come as a complete surprise.

Murky practices

The paparazzi and tabloid journalists always seem to know where celebrities will be, that is how the magazine Heat survives. Just think, without Heat we would not know what Cheryl Cole looks like without make-up! Dark days indeed.

It could be suggested that the reason they know the whereabouts of celebrities, is because they have intercepted their calls. But wait, all journalists have complete integrity don't they?

As an aspiring journalist myself, I believe that most do but there are bound to be a few rotten apples at the bottom of the barrel and it is these apples that often get the juiciest stories. So the temptation to play fast and loose with ethics must be tempting.

Political

This 'scandal' also has a political side to it. The Guardian is a left leaning newspaper that would presumably not want the Conservatives to be elected. Andy Coulson, David Cameron's director of Communications, is the former News of the World editor who resigned following the jailing of one of his journalists for phone hacking.

It could be suggested that The Guardian is trying to damage Cameron's reputation by painting Coulson as a man with no morals. The paper would probably answer this, by saying that the story is in the public interest and Coulson needs to be made an example of.

The problem at the moment is that there appears to be no hard evidence linking the former editor with the hacking. If this evidence does come out then expect Cameron to fire Coulson pretty quickly, but until then it looks like his job is safe.

McBride comparison

The reason Cameron is loathed to get rid of Coulson, is because he is extremely good at his job. However, with an election less than a year away the Tories will not want their well cultivated public image to be damaged, so even a hint of something fishy could see Coulson face the axe.

On the Labour side MPs have been trying to compare Coulson with 'Mr. nasty', Damien McBride (http://wilson-whatsitallabout.blogspot.com/2009/04/damian-mcbride-gives-gordon-brown.html) who lost his government job after trying to smear top Conservatives via an email campaign.

At the moment though Coulson does not quite measure up to McBride. In McBride's case the evidence of wrong-doing was produced and he swiftly resigned. It is understandable for Labour to play this card, but it is not as yet a particularly strong argument.

Identification

Another strand to this saga is the decision so far by The Guardian not to identify the journalists involved in the hacking. MPs will find this hard to take, particularly as the newspapers had no quarms about identifying MPs who allegedly fiddled their expenses.

If the newspaper has names then there is no reason not to publish them. If journalists are hacking phones then arguably, they deserve to be exposed by the press.

It will be interesting to see whether celeberity scandals feature less in newspapers over the coming weeks.